Re: Too much trouble with PO

[Jack Miller <jgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We've done each upgrade possible since we purchased PO  - 12? months 
ago.  NEVER lost a setting. NEVER.

On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 01:05 PM, Ben Reubenstein wrote:

> Marc -
>
> That sucks!  Our PO install is still running 709! and is rock solid! 
> WE are getting ready to upgrade though.  Hope I have not spoken too 
> soon...
>
> I think PO is a quality product, you just have to configure it right.
>
> Good Luck,
>
> Ben Reubenstein
>
> Marc Kaiwi wrote:
> > Every time, just when I think it's going okay something else breaks 
> > with PostOffice! I've upgraded to 717 because I was having some 
> > trouble and now none of my dynamic filters are working. Again!!
> > I've got to say that I've never had so many things go wrong with a 
> > software program as I have with PO. My intention (6 months ago) was 
> > to run some medium sized email lists with po but it just never was 
> > reliable enough for long enough to trust it. To this day I couldn't 
> > justify moving to PO. I like it, I wish I could get it stable 
> > enough to put into production.
> > Any ideas?
> > Thanks again,
> > Marc Kaiwi
> > ---------
> > Tenon Intersystems' Post.Office Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe: send mail to post_office-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with the body only containing: unsubscribe
> > Find the searchable mailing list archives at:
> > http://postoffice.computeroil.com/
>
> ---------
> Tenon Intersystems' Post.Office Mailing List
> To unsubscribe: send mail to post_office-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with the body only containing: unsubscribe
> Find the searchable mailing list archives at:
> http://postoffice.computeroil.com/

---------
Tenon Intersystems' Post.Office Mailing List
To unsubscribe: send mail to post_office-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the body only containing: unsubscribe
Find the searchable mailing list archives at:
http://postoffice.computeroil.com/