Re: Bayesian filtering is driving me nuts.

[Bear Weiter <bear-lists@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> I use spamsieve on my mac and it is even more effective than Apple's filter.
> It has Bayesian filters too and they work great as you train them. My guess is
> that SA does the same thing when the Bayesian filters work right (mine don't
> yet).  Anyone care to comment?

I agree about Spamsieve - I had to quit filtering at the server level last
year when I moved my server to a slower machine, and of course spam was
already a big enough problem that it really took over. Adding Spamsieve to
Entourage worked great, and it's been nearly flawless (it catches 99.x% of
my spam).

I hope when I get back into server side filtering that I can get SA to be
almost as good as it.

>From the success I've seen with Spamsieve, I'd love to see it running at the
server level as well.

--Bear

---------
Tenon Intersystems' Post.Office Mailing List
To unsubscribe: send mailto:post_office-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the body only containing: 
unsubscribe
Find the searchable mailing list archives at:
http://postoffice.computeroil.com/