I find it of interest that you stand as an Independent Sovereign, why do you
stand as such? If you stood as a U.S. citizen you could find remedy through
the courts...
> From: Angela Kahealani <angela@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Organization: ANGELA KAHEALANI
> Reply-To: webten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:45:54 -0500
> To: wgroleau@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: machten@xxxxxxxxx, Anita Holmgren <anita@xxxxxxxxx>, Steve Holmgren
> <holmgren@xxxxxxxxx>, support@xxxxxxxxx, sales@xxxxxxxxx,
> info@xxxxxxxxx, webten@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Uniform Commercial Code (was Re: Final Demand For Refund)
> Resent-From: webten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 10:45:54 -1000
>
> As for those of you who have positive experiences with PM10,
> please note and remember I said "on my computer". This has been
> with Mac OS versions from 7.5 through 9.0.4 on a PowerMac 6100,
> with and without using my Newer G3 PDS upgrade card...
> This is a NuBus based 1st generation bottom-of-the-PPC-line.
> Tenon continues to advertise they work on all Macs.
> I got tired of sending MacsBug dump logs to them.
>
> I'm sure there are very many satisfied customers, whose needs
> are in fact met on their configurations with whatever subset
> of the total software package they actually use. I don't
> consider frequent random crashes combined with trashing
> the desktop file of an HFS+ volume just by mounting it into
> the Unix file hierarchy so that once it crashes the desktop
> has to be rebuilt, viable. Each crash took my website down
> for over an hour. Multiple times per day. Unacceptable.
> When I gave up on PM10 a year ago and switched to Webten:
> Webten won't boot far enough to even enter the admin password!
> Tenon fixed neither PM10 nor WebTen for my config.
> This is the single most expensive hunk of software I've
> ever purchased, and when I run "it" either the computer crashes
> or I cannot even perform a find of files in my HFS+ volume
> from either the Mac or Unix side. Unacceptable. For years now!
>
> For those of you who didn't like my "public trashing of Tenon",
> please note that this was posted exactly one year after I
> did the same thing, and Anita said they would at least fix
> some of the bugs, and requested a list of those we felt
> most important, and that there have been NO Machten bugs
> fixed in the interim other than the minium to get it to
> not crash on MacOS 9.0.4. All the bug reports go ignored.
> She offered an additional contract with all PM10 customers,
> and many of us accepted that contract of performance,
> and after a year's elapsed time, there was no performance.
>
> I have no fear of being sued for libel or slander, for
> everything I have said is absolutely true, and I included
> concurrence from many other customers. I did not trash,
> I merely stated the facts. Tenon is in breach of contract.
>
> "W. Wesley Groleau" wrote:
>> Angela, have you sent any of this to the Federal Trade Commission?
>
> The long answer is at <URL:http://www.kahealani.com/ucc/>.
> I am an independent sovereign, I stand alone, equivalent to
> a separate nation whose population is one. I have no social
> or commercial contracts with the United States of America,
> or with the united States of America, or with the U.S., or
> with any county or city. I cannot use the statute system.
> I stand outside of it. The only "law" which applies to my
> relationship with anything on this planet is the Uniform
> Commercial Code, and the only remedy thereunder is to file
> a UCC-1 Commercial Lien to enforce either performance of,
> or compensation for failure to perform, on any commercial
> contract. Notice my "signature" line... we're dealing with
> private law here, not public policy or statutes. You've
> all been brainwashed at the state indoctrination centers,
> and therefore expect a criminal statute violation lawsuit.
> There will be no judge involved, for I do not stand in
> normal contract with Tennon like the rest of you do...
> I modifed the contract, changed the terms, the venue,
> the jurisdiction of the contract between Tenon and I,
> because after notifying them I stood in private law with
> them, they failed to terminate my license. Not even most
> lawyers fully understand this, and even if they do, they
> never "go there". Why they can't "go there" is a long story.
> A lawyer can only represent a corporation, and a corporation
> can only be represented by a lawyer, and every lawyer in
> U.S. jurisdiction is a foreign agent of the British crown.
> Most of you are public trust corporations, which can only
> appear at law represented by a lawyer who represents the
> crown, not your interests. Pull out your "Driver's License".
> By signing it (you did or they wouldn't have issued it),
> you agreed that you were the public corporate trust named
> "JOHN DOE" instead of being a private person "John Doe".
> There is a strong legal difference, nothing is the same.
> The state holds title to your corporation, you are a
> 100% owned chattel property slave of the corporation
> named the U.S., which is in multiple bankruptcy receivership
> to both the Federal Reserve System, and to the British Crown
> which itself is in bankruptcy recievership to the Pope's bank.
> Your allegiance is to Mammon.
>
> I am the holder in due course of the title to my body,
> and to my straw man transmitting utility "ANGELA KAHEALANI",
> their allegiance is to me, "Angela Kahealani", whose allegiance
> is to God, not Mammon. I carry no marks of the beast, and
> have no business in a court of Mammon. I doubt even one of
> you has other than the adhesion contract Tennon offered you
> which binds you into Mammon's jurisdiction where corporations
> live. I am in a completely different legal status than you.
> I am not a statutory citizen. I will never be represented by
> a lawyer, I will only present my Self. I will never appear in
> the jurisdiction of either Federal or State law or courts.
> I sit as sovereign in private law. My guess is that Tenon
> wasn't paying enough attention or didn't have enough legal
> knowledge to recognize the shift of venue, but ignorance of
> the law is no excuse, the contract between us was modified,
> and because they did not terminate it, it sits in private law.
> They never objected to our relationship sitting in private law.
>
> As for the comment of my handling support if/when I get title,
> no thanks, I decline your offer. I don't want title and have
> no interest in running their corporation, I'd just sell it.
>
> After reading this, my guess is that Tenon's position will shift.
> They will be coming out of their illusions about the exact
> contract between us, and my actual legal power to effect remedy.
> They've had plenty time to perform, and I will no longer
> accept performance as satisfaction of our contract. At this
> point I will only accept a 100% refund as satisfaction.
> I hereby terminate my software licenses from Tenon as not
> fulfilling our contract, and demand 100% refund of all
> monies paid, while preserving all my rights without prejudice,
> UCC 1-207, therefore the contract is not colorable despite
> our having transacted in private bankruptcy debt scrip
> commonly misrepresented as Federal Reserve Notes, which in fact
> are not Federal, are not backed-up with a reserve, and are not
> notes. Tenon's lawyers would be well advised to take note that
> the contract between Tenon and I ceased being colorable when
> I converted it to private law, therefore it cannot go "to court"
> for negotiation, as it ceased being a negotiable contract.
>
> Angela Kahealani, Independent Sovereign
>
> --
> All information + transactions non negotiable and private between the
> parties. All Rights Reserved + Copyright 2000 Angela Kahealani.
> <URL:http://www.kahealani.com>
>
> ----
> Tenon Intersystems' WebTen Mailing List
> To unsubscribe: send mail to webten-request@xxxxxxxxx
> with the subject: unsubscribe
> Find searchable Mailing List archives at
> http://listsearch.blueworld.com/webtensearch.lasso
>
|
