Re: iTools 5 vs 6 ?

[Doug Hardman <doug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have a few 1.2/5.0 servers and recently upgraded to a 10.0.3/6.0 box. I'm
very pleased with the performance. It is also on a B&W-400.

The performance seems to be right on par with the older version, but I get
the ability to rest easy knowing that the OS is supported. I'll be moving
all of my web servers over to this config in the coming month.

It's worth the upgrade in my book.

    -Doug
-- 
Douglas Hardman
doug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Silver Creek, Ltd.

> From: "Arin T. Brown" <arin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: itools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 09:58:11 -0500
> To: <itools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: iTools 5 vs 6 ?
> 
> I'm currently running OS X Server v1.2 (the old one) and considering
> switching from the built-in Apache to iTools, but I'm wondering if I'd be
> better off upgrading to OS X 10.0.4 and getting iTools 6.
> 
> Does anyone know what the performance diff from the client side is?
> 
> Machine being used is a B&W G3 450Mhz with 384megs of ram, so the
> Altivec/multi processor issues/advantages don't really apply.
> 
> -Arin
> 
> ________________________________________________________
> Arin T. Brown
> CFO/System Administrator
> Trans-Email, Inc.
> http://www.trans-email.com
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> Tenon Intersystems' itools Mailing List
> To unsubscribe: send mailto://itools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with the body: unsubscribe


---
Tenon Intersystems' itools Mailing List
To unsubscribe: send mailto://itools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the body: unsubscribe